Legal Opinion

State v. McGill

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1993No. 49A04-9305-CR-168PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Defendants-Appellees Antone McGill’s and Charles Skaggs’s motions to dismiss charges of operating a motor vehicle after license forfeited for life. IND. CODE 9-30-10-17.

We reverse.

The State’s single issue for review is whether the trial court erred when it dismissed the charges.

On September 18, 1992, the State charged McGill with operating a motor ve- hide after his license was forfeited for life. IC 9-30-10-17. Skaggs was charged with the same offense on June 22, 1992. The driving privileges of each were declared forfeited under a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. GeiseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Rudolph v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ajabu v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Bishop v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. D.M.Z.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Holt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hollingsworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API