State v. McGill
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Defendants-Appellees Antone McGill’s and Charles Skaggs’s motions to dismiss charges of operating a motor vehicle after license forfeited for life. IND. CODE 9-30-10-17.
We reverse.
The State’s single issue for review is whether the trial court erred when it dismissed the charges.
On September 18, 1992, the State charged McGill with operating a motor ve- hide after his license was forfeited for life. IC 9-30-10-17. Skaggs was charged with the same offense on June 22, 1992. The driving privileges of each were declared forfeited under a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. GeiseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rudolph v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ajabu v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bishop v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. D.M.Z.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Holt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Hollingsworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.