Holt v. State

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Defendant Waymon Holt moved to dismiss a charge of operating a motor vehicle after his privileges were forfeited for life. Holt argued that he could not be convicted under the current statute because his privileges were forfeited under a section of the Indiana Code that had since been repealed. The trial court denied the motion and, on interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed. Holt v. State (1993), Ind.App., 627 N.E.2d 461. The Court of Appeals was correct.

On April 16, 1990, the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles determined that Holt had been operating a…