Legal Opinion
Rickabaugh v. Berryhill
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 22, 2017No. Civ. No. 16-225-LPSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, U.S. District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Keith Rickabaugh (“Plaintiff’ or “Rickabaugh”) appeals the decision of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “the Commissioner”), denying his claim for Social Security disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title II and Title XVI, respectively, of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403, 1381-1383f. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Favazza v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- HENNING v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Hilda Luz Velazquez Mendez v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- SADOWSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020