Legal Opinion

Berry, Admr. v. Rutland Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 5, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

The decedent, a resident of Middletown, Connecticut, was killed on a grade crossing by a train of the defendant railroad. This action was brought by his administrator under the provisions of G-. L. 3314 and 3315, to recover damages for the benefit of his widow and children. The defendant filed an answer in which the legality of the appointment of the plaintiff as administrator is denied, because, as it is alleged, the probate court was without jurisdiction to appoint him, since neither the decedent nor the defendant was a resident of the probate district and the decedent left no property…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boston & M. R. R. v. HurdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  2. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Legg v. BrittonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  4. Pinney v. McGregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. De Valle Da CostaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brown, Admr. v. Perry, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Estate of WaitsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Matter of Estate of HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. Whitchurch v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API