Legal Opinion

Kelly v. United Parcel Service Inc

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 2, 2025No. 4:24-cv-01001Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION KATHERINE KELLY PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:24-CV-01001-BSM UNITED STATES PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and KENT HARDY DEFENDANTS ORDER Kent Hardy’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. No. 26] is granted. United Parcel Service’s (UPS) motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. No. 24] is granted on Katherine Kelly’s claims of age discrimination, disability discrimination, and outrage. UPS’s motion is denied on Kelly’s sex discrimination and retaliation claims under the Arkansas Civil Rights Act (ACRA). I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API