Legal Opinion

Stuthman v. Stuthman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1994No. S-92-043PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Further appellate review by this court was granted in this litigation to consider whether the Nebraska Court of Appeals was correct in holding that forcible entry and detainer actions do not apply to agricultural property.

We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and hold that a landlord may regain possession of his or her agricultural property by forcible entry and detainer when the property is unlawfully and forcibly detained by another.

In this cause, Elsie Stuthman, hereinafter referred to as the landlord, filed a petition in the Colfax County Court seeking the return of certain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. Diller Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ebert v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Rigel Corp. v. CutchallNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dammann v. LittyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. KarelNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. UrbanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stewart v. BennettNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. North Star Mut. Ins. Co. v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. North Star Mut. Ins. Co. v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API