Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2005No. 36A05-0505-CR-262PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, the State of Indiana (the State), appeals the trial court's Order granting Appellee-Defendant's, Mark J. Murray (Murray), Motion to Suppress Eivi-dence.

We affirm.

ISSUE

The State raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the trial court erred in granting Murray's Motion to Suppress Evidence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1

On the evening of May 13, 2004, Officer Gilbert Carpenter (Officer Carpenter) of the Seymour Police Department responded to a dispatch call that an individual was disorderly at the pool hall located at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Utley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. FarberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Rios v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Denton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kevin M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Tyrone Grayson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Derek Scisney v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Charles Dunson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API