Shambleau v. Hoyt
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Defendants, being partners and operating under the firm name Prince' & Whitely, conducted a brokerage business in the city of Detroit. This was a branch office, the home office being in New York. Plaintiff, acting through her husband, bought and sold stocks through defendants’ agency. She brought this suit to recover losses sustained. Her cause of action involves losses incident to: First, purchases and* sales of Wilcox-Rich B stock; second, purchases and sales of stock of the Michigan Steel Company; and third, the sale of 300 shares of Radio Corporation of America. On trial before the court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Haney Manufacturing Co. v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- McNeilly v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Barnard v. Lapeer & Port Huron Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1859
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Northline Excavating, Inc. v. Livingston CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. SaxonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
- Rumbos v. SingosMichigan Supreme Court · 1950