Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Rice

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1907No. 16,318PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry; William Joel Sandoz, Judge ad hoc. Action by A. Louis Lehman against William M. Rice and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

On February 8, 1906, J. A. Haas and A. Louis Lehman executed a notarial contract, styled a “promise of sale,” in which the former acknowledged the receipt of $2,050 from the latter “on account of tho purchase price” of 800 acres of land situated in the parish of St. Landry. The act contained the following stipulations:

“And, in consideration of, the said partial payment on the purchase price of said lands, the said Haas has promised and does by these presents hereby promise and obligate himself to execute a deed of sale to the said Lehman of the said lands for the price and consideration of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Girault v. FeuchtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Peck v. BemissSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  3. Baldwin v. MoreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  4. Barfield v. SaundersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. Crochet v. McCamantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ober v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  2. Kinberger v. DrouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Jaenke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  5. Nosacka v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API