Legal Opinion
Reeves v. Rocklin Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2003No. C036977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
In this matter we decide whether members of the Sanctity of Human Life Network (SOHLNET) have the right to come onto the campus of Rocklin High School to distribute anti-abortion, proabstinence literature to students before class. Because a high school is not a college campus or public forum, we conclude that the school administration may constitutionally limit access by outsiders, regardless of their message or purpose, in order to prevent disruption.
Plaintiffs Martha Reeves, Harry Reeves, John Picker, and Murray Lewis are members of SOHLNET who sought to distribute…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Braxton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'TOOLE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nathan G. v. Clovis Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re A.B. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kuba v. SeaWorld CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Miguel H.California Court of Appeal · 2010