Milling MacHinery, Jones-Hettel-Sater Const. Co. v. Thomas

RILEY, ,T.

This is a proceeding for re. view of an award of the State Industrial. Commission.

Respondent Thomas files a cross-petition for review.

Petitioner admits the accidental injury and liability therefor, but complains that the award is excessive. Cross-petitioner contends that the award, so far as made, is correct, but complains because the Commission did not award him compensation for disfigurement.

The injury is the loss of the use of one eye. Because of the accidental injury it be came necessary to remove the eyeball, ana it is on that account that claimant claims compensation for…