Legal Opinion

Meadow River Lumber Co. v. Smith

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1939No. 8741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

This appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of a bill of review, held inadequate and not permitted to be filed by the circuit court. Appeal was granted the proponent of the rejected pleading.

The primary parties in the original cause are Meadow River Lumber Company, plaintiff, and Myrtle Smith and Sun Lumber Company, defendants. Other parties came in by petition. A decree on the merits was entered May 19, 1937, granting to the plaintiff certain of the relief prayed in the bill. The Sun Lumber Company filed neither demurrer nor answer but permitted the final decree to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webb v. RitterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Barbour v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Gallatin Land, Coal & Oil Co. v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Reger v. McAllisterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Camden v. FerrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. HartleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Meadow River Lumber Co. v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Edlis, Inc. v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Webber v. OffhausWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API