Legal Opinion
People v. Matelski
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 2000No. E025259PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
The People appeal denial of a motion to reinstate a criminal complaint under Penal Code section 871.5.1 (§ 1238, subd. (a)(9).) The People contend that section 871.5 allows a motion for reinstatement when the superior court determines the magistrate erred in granting a suppression motion under section 1538.5. On the merits, the People contend the magistrate erred in finding that the officers acted unreasonably in detaining defendants to determine if they were convicted felons. The People argue the officer’s actions were reasonable because defendants were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. ToneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. RiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- William Platt v. Jason MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- State v. ReynoldsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. Gutierrez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.