Legal Opinion
State v. Reynolds
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 2007No. 32374PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Chief Judge.
Jeremy Dean Reynolds appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine. Reynolds specifically challenges the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Because we conclude that Reynolds’s motion to suppress should have been granted, we vacate Reynolds’s judgment of conviction.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The following facts were revealed through testimony and were set forth by the district court in its findings in denying Reynolds’s motion to suppress. At 11:45 p.m. on April 7, 2004, probation officers and a police officer conducted a search of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PhippsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Chad Lee WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Zapata-ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Chad Lee WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Chad Lee WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016