Legal Opinion
People v. Whitely
California Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
think it appears that the examination was before a police magistrate. The commitment is signed by “James Lawler, Judge of the Police Judge’s Court No. 2, of the city and county of San Francisco.”
The defendant ivas charged with the crime of grand larceny, and the jury, by their verdict, found her “ guilty as charged.” This was a sufficient finding of the degree.
Judgment and orders appealed from affirmed.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Inklebarger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- People v. SachauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- State v. McDonaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.