Legal Opinion

Orrick v. Hoeptner

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1930No. Docket No. 6186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action for personal injuries to the wife, for medical expenses incurred, and property damage, all growing out of the collision of defendant’s and plaintiffs’ automobiles on the twentieth day of December, 1927. The court awarded judgment to plaintiffs in the sum of $960 for the injuries to the wife, medical expenses incurred by her and for damage to their automobile. Prom this judgment defendant appeals.

Appellant’s contentions are 'substantially that there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff, and that there were two causes of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meek v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Farrar v. WhippleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Fassett v. NascimientoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API