Legal Opinion

Scholtens v. Schneider

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 30, 1995No. 1—92—3160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Braden

Respondent, Electrical Insurance Trustees, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County adjudicating a subrogation lien. On appeal, respondent argues that the trial court erroneously applied the Illinois common fund doctrine as opposed to the doctrine of Federal preemption.

We affirm.

Petitioner, Randy Scholtens, participated in an employee benefit plan, as defined in section 4(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1988)). The plan was administered by respondent and provided plan benefits which include the payment of hospital…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Sundstrand-Sauer v. Estate of ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. Thomas Linthicum, Patricia Linthicum, Christy LinthicumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Fravel v. StankusDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. Blackburn v. BeckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. Estate of Lake v. MartenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Musinski v. StaudacherDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API