Legal Opinion
Estate of Dittman v. BIESENBACH, ADMR. ETC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 1953No. 18,411PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKendall, C. J.
This action was instituted by appellee to revoke letters of administration issued to appellant. Appellee’s petition alleged that he was the surviving spouse of the decedent, Louise Dittman, as a result of common-law marriage, and, therefore, entitled to administer the estate.
The trial court found for the appellee, that he was the common-law surviving spouse and so entitled to administer the estate.
Motion for new trial filed containing the following specifications, to-wit:
1. The decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.
2. The decision of the court is contrary to law.
3. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Teter v. TeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Baker v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Topper v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- McChesney v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glasgo v. GlasgoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Estate of DallmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Deremiah v. Powers-Thompson Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955
- Azimow v. AZIMOWIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.