Columbia Portland Cement Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, Columbia Portland Cement Company, seeks review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) finding the petitioner to have violated section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) by refusing to reinstate employees who participated in a protected strike, withdrawing recognition from the Union, and making unilateral changes in wages and benefits. The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of its order.
I
Petitioner, Columbia Portland Cement Company (the “Company”), operates a limestone shale quarry…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- V & S Progalv, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- National Labor Relations Board v. D & D Enterprises, Incorporated, D/B/A Beltway Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Manna Pro Partners, L.P. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Calex Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.