Legal Opinion

Cover v. Cushing Capital Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1985No. 1245PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a broker-dealer can be held vicariously liable for the acts of an agent or liable for negligent supervision of an agent who has fraudulently obtained and converted moneys from would-be investors. The trial court, following trial without jury, found that the principal was not liable for fraudulent machinations of the agent which were unknown to the broker-dealer. We affirm.

In 1972, while associated with Investors Security, Carl Fugh met Alice Salzillo. She, in turn, introduced him to Mabel Cover, Richard Woodhall, Kenneth Horrell, and R. Joseph…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Slaseman v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Todd v. SkellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Snellbaker v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Heller v. Patwil Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Waslow v. Grant Thornton LLP (In Re Jack Greenberg, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API