Blakeley v. Kingsbury
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney General, and M. C. Glenn, Deputy Attorney General, for AppeEant.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On the tenth day of December, 1903, plaintiff filed in the office of the surveyor general and register of the land office her duly verified application to purchase from the state under the provisions of an act entitled “An Act regulating the sale of the lands uncovered by the recession or drainage of the waters of inland lakes and unsegregated swamp and overflowed lands and validating sales and surveys heretofore made,” approved March 24, 1893 [Stats. 1893, p. 341], all of section 15, in township 22 south, range 18 east, M. D. M., situated in Kings county, this state.
The said application…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Wirth v. BransonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bludworth v. Lake (No. 1.)California Supreme Court · 1867
- Garfield v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.