Neal & Co. v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 37 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Morse on Banks and Banking, p. 348. Smith’s Leading Cases, 95. 7 Miss. 648, Tierman v. Commercial Bank of Natchez. 7 S. & M. 592, Com'. Bank of Manchester v. Agric’l Bank. 4 Robinson’s L. R. 109. 1 Peters, 25. 2 How. 66. 6 Cowen, 310. 1 How. 284. 3 S. & M. 389. 15 Wend. 486. 10 Eng. Com.
Read the full summary
Case 37 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Morse on Banks and Banking, p. 348. Smith’s Leading Cases, 95. 7 Miss. 648, Tierman v. Commercial Bank of Natchez. 7 S. & M. 592, Com'. Bank of Manchester v. Agric’l Bank. 4 Robinson’s L. R. 109. 1 Peters, 25. 2 How. 66. 6 Cowen, 310. 1 How. 284. 3 S. & M. 389. 15 Wend. 486. 10 Eng. Com. Law, 145. 23 Pick. 332. 1 Cushing, 177. 17 Louisiana, 563. 12 Cowen, 303. CITED Myers’s Supplement, 354, Act of 1864, section 3.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYOR
delivered the opinion oe the court.
Gray & Todd were the drawers of a bill of exchange upon R. P. Pepper for one thousand dollars, due in sixty days from the 11th of October, 1867; made payable to Edward H. Taylor; accepted by Pepper; indorsed by Taylor to J. B. Temple, by Temple to H. I. Todd, and by Todd to James A. Edwards & Co., who are succeeded by the appellants, E. Neal & Co. The paper was made and indorsed for the benefit of Pepper, the acceptor, and by him sold with the various indorsements upon it to the appellants. The bill shortly before its maturity was sent by James A.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Todd v. Edwards & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
3Cited by4 opinions
- M. V. Monarch Co. v. Farmers & Traders BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Creekmore v. Justice & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Farmers' Bank v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- Pickens v. KniselyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886