Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pickens v. Knisely

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1886Published

1DissentGreen, Judge

I fully concur with President Johnson, that the certificate of a justice of the privy examination and acknowledgment of a married woman of a deed conveying her land is in the nature of a judicial act, and that she cannot by parol evidence contradict the facts set out in the certificate of the justice so as to avoid the effect of such deed, when it has been executed by her and duly recorded with the appended certificate in due form, unless she first establish by satisfactory parol evidence, that with the concurrence of those claiming the land under her deed she had been defrauded or imposed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  2. Wandling v. StrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Tavenner v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Wannell v. KemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Danks v. RodeheaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API