Legal Opinion

Bond v. Cornell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1951No. 34051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUTTRELL, Y.C.J.

This is an action on account for the rental of various items of oil field equipment, brought by plaintiff, Cornell, against the defendants, B. T. Murphree and Reford Bond, Jr., alleged to be copart-ners doing business as Murphree & Bond Drilling Company. After plaintiff had produced his evidence and rested, defendant Murphree moved for a directed verdict on the ground that, as stipulated between the parties, he had been adjudicated a bankrupt prior to the trial of the case. The trial court sustained his motion and directed a verdict in his favor. Thereupon defendant Bond…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. MobleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Vacuum Oil Co. v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Moore v. DiehmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Champlin Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Henderson v. Trammell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenz v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Lenz v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API