Legal Opinion

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rachels

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1930No. 19670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The chose in action sued on, being one involving a property right, was assignable. Sullivan v. Curling, 149 Ga. 96 (99 S. E. 533, 5 A. L. R. 124).

2. It appearing from the allegations in the petition that the title to the alleged chose in action sued on (a right of action against the defendant for a trespass upon real estate by cutting and removing therefrom growing timber) was, at the time of the filing of the suit, not in the plaintiff, the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company, but in another as the plaintiff's assignee, viz. the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation, which was not a party…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reserve Life Insurance v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Lumpkin v. American Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Hoxie v. Americus Automobile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Browder v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Trulock v. LambCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API