Reserve Life Insurance v. Peavy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Certain of the grounds of demurrer raise the issue as to whether the plaintiff has “made a complete assignment of the cause of action sued upon and of all benefits due to him under the policy” so as to vest the right of recovery thereon solely in the assignee, the Macon Hospital. To decide this question it is necessary to analyze of what this cause of action consists. Code § 3-108 provides as follows: “As a general rule, the action on a contract, whether express or implied, or whether by parol or under seal, or of record, shall be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. WellhouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Jones v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Wheeler v. StapletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Santiago v. Safeway InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America v. RiedlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Lovett v. American Family Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Vulcan Life Insurance v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Ateyeh v. Volkswagen of Florence, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.