Legal Opinion
Combs v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 13, 1909No. 208PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from District Court, Choctaw County; D. A. Richardson, Judge. Action by J. H. Miller against Ed Combs and another. Judgment for .plaintiff, and defendants bring error. I. L. Strange, for plaintiff in error, citing: McLaughlin v. Ardmore Loan and Trust Go., 21 Okla. 173; Fish v. Arnold (Ind. T.) 104 S. W. 824.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
February 7, 1908, J. H. Miller filed suit against Ed and Sarah Combs to recover judgment upon a promissory note dated September 17, 1903. Defendant filed answer as follows :
“Defendants state: That the supposed promissory note herein sued on in the petition mentioned was for the payment of the right to possession only of a certain tract of land, lying and being in the Choctaw Nation, Indian Territory, more particularly described and known as the ‘Sim Casey/'or the old ‘Jim Colbert5 place; the same being located about two miles north of Old Goodland, Choctaw Nation, Indian Territory.' 'That, at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woods & Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Swanger v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Holt v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Ladda v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- McLaughlin v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bledsoe v. WortmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lynch v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Harper v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Third National Exchange Bank v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- Clawson v. Cottingham Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.