Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. Sandy Rural Fire Protection District 72

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 9, 2000No. 97-08354; CA A104640Published

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order dismissing his request for a hearing. The Board held that claimant had not shown good cause for filing his request more than 60 days after SAIF denied his claim. We affirm.

Claimant is a volunteer firefighter for employer, Sandy Rural Fire Protection District 72. He was responding to employer’s call when he slipped and injured his knee.1 Claimant filed a workers’ compensation claim on November 22, 1996. SAIF denied his claim because the injury did not occur within the course and scope of employment. SAIF mailed its denial on April…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosa v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  2. Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Berwick v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Ogden Aviation v. LayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Mendoza v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API