Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. 90-12948, 90-12949; CA A73642PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Claimant seeks review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. The Board found that claimant had not established good cause for an untimely filing of a request for hearing from a responsibility denial. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

The issue is whether claimant established good cause under ORS GSe.SlEKlXb), 1 by proving that his attorney gave two timely directives to his legal assistant to file a request for hearing, but she failed to do so. The Board found these facts: Claimant was consecutively employed by two employers. The first employer was insured…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Brown v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Compensation of Hanna v. McGrew Bros. Sawmill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Anderson v. Publishers Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Hanna v. McGrew Bros. Sawmill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogden Aviation v. LayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. McComas v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Rhoades v. Sandy Rural Fire Protection District 72Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API