Legal Opinion
Seiko Epson Corp. v. Coretronic Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 15, 2009No. C 06-06946 MHPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of Invalidity
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff/counter-defendant Seiko Epson Corporation (“Seiko Epson”) brought this action against defendant/counter-claimant Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. (collectively “Coretronic”), alleging infringement of several United States patents, including U.S. Patent No. 6,203,158 (“the '158 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,527,392 (“the '392 patent”). Coretronic counterclaimed, alleging infringement of two United States patents, including U.S. Patent No. 6,742,899 (“the '899 patent”). Now…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.