Legal Opinion

People v. Gurule

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1965No. Crim. 9946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.

By information, defendants Gurule, Gonzales and Sandoval (not appealing), were charged with burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). In addition, four prior felony convictions were alleged as to Gonzales, and two as to Gurule. On the issue of the truth of the alleged prior convictions a jury trial was waived and the court found each prior conviction to be true. Thereafter, a jury convicted each defendant of the burglary charge. Gurule and Gonzales appeal from the judgments rendered.

Daryl Mulligan, a manager at the Buy-Fair Market in the City of Industry, closed the market and set the burglar alarm at 12…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. ArendsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API