Legal Opinion

People v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1966No. Crim. 10093PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, defendants William Ross Phillips and Janet Phillips, and codefendant Berna G. Oliver, were charged in Counts I, III, IX, and X with a violation of section 476a of the Penal Code (issuing checks without sufficient funds), and in Counts II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, and XI with the crime of grand theft. In Count XII, the Phillipses and Oliver were charged with the crime of conspiracy to commit grand theft. In addition, three prior felonies were alleged against William Phillips.

Motions under Penal Code section 995 were denied as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. GrubbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. GarayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API