Langbell v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.
We granted a petition for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, Department A, which affirmed an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona, finding that the claimant had no permanent physical disability or loss of function for work.
We must answer the following questions :
1. Does the claimant have a present physical impairment or loss of function as the result of the industrial injury, and
2. If so, is this a scheduled or unscheduled disability ?
The facts necessary for a-determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. Arnie…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Williams v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Sims v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Garrard v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Ortega v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hunter v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Time, D.C. Freight Lines v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.