State v. Sugden
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
The controlling issue concerns whether there was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of escape based upon the state’s theory of culpability. We hold that when the information al leges an escape from an institution and the jury is so instructed, the state must prove that the defendant progressed beyond the institution grounds. Because there was no proof of this fact, we reverse the escape conviction.
State’s witnesses testified that a car commandeered by three inmates and carrying hostages crashed through an inner fence of the Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution but did not get…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. WilliquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. NordnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Fabian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. FawcettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- State v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. SugdenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. State Ex Rel. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990