Legal Opinion

Portwood v. Ford Motor Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1998No. 84488PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

Gwendolyn Portwood and 51 other plaintiffs appeal the following holdings of the circuit and appellate courts: (1) the filing in federal court of a complaint seeking certification of a class action does not toll, or suspend, the Illinois statute of limitations during the pendency of that complaint; and (2) plaintiffs whose breach of warranty claims are dismissed by a federal court for lack of jurisdiction have six months to refile those claims in Illinois state court. We affirm both holdings.

BACKGROUND

On August 21, 1981, a group of plaintiffs filed a complaint in United States District Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wade v. Danek Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Primavera Familienstifung v. AskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API