Legal Opinion

Butwinick v. Hepner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2012No. 56303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case comes before the court on respondents’ motion to substitute themselves as real parties in interest and to dismiss the appeal. Respondents acquired appellants’ rights and interests in the underlying district court action at a judgment execution sale. Appellants oppose the motion. In moving to substitute in as real parties in interest and dismiss the appeal, respondents seek to foreclose appellants’ defenses to respondents’ own claims, which were successftdly litigated in the district court, and the decision on those claims timely appealed. Although Nevada’s judgment execution…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. RMA Ventures California v. SunAmerica Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Applied Medical Technologies, Inc. v. EamesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Brown v. ReaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. REYNOLDS VS. TUFENKJIANNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Patricia Arellano v. Clark County Collection Serv.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API