Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

General Motors Corporation v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 15, 1983No. Appeal 52-71, 453-71Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSkelton, Senior Circuit Judge

I concur with the result reached by the majority denying recovery to the appellant on its claims for rebates of excise taxes relating to., the 10 percent payments (or credits) which appellant allowed or paid to its dealers in connection with its GMC Heavy-Duty Program and its Chevrolet Heavy-Duty Program, and relating to the allowances appellant made to its dealers as a part of its Chevrolet Passenger Car Program and its Chevrolet Light-Duty Program, and its GMC Light-Duty Program, and with its affirmance of the United States Claims Court judgment denying recovery on such claims. However, I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. General Motors Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API