Legal Opinion
State v. Mann
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 2010No. AC 27779PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Jason Mann, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). On appeal, the defendant challenges as improper the trial court’s instructions to the jury concerning (1) his consciousness of guilt and (2) his interest in the outcome of the case when assessing his credibility, which he alleges violated both his federal and state constitutional rights. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. At…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Portuondo v. AgardSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Reagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. MannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. ChavezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019