Legal Opinion

Bessinger v. De Loach

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 1956No. 17188PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages against the defendant, who was her dentist, and alleged injuries resulting from burns to her mouth which were caused by a substance that was applied to a denture made by the defendant for her and which he was fitting in her mouth; thereby the denture was relined and the substance hardened and became a part of it.

It was alleged in the complaint that the injuries were caused by the negligence, willfullness and wantonness of the defendant in administering the substance in her mouth for a longer period of time than necessary and by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Eickhoff v. Beard-Laney, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Dimock v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Corbett v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  3. Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API