Ball v. Shannon
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Defendant. Plaintiffs appeal, telling us in their brief that: “The simple issue here is: Did the trial court have a right to dismiss Plaintiffs’ action for violation of a statute of limitations?” We conclude that the answer is, yes.
Plaintiffs’ action is based on the failure of Defendant to pay a promissory note, dated February 13, 1983. In March, 1991, an action on the same promissory note was brought by Plaintiffs. On November 15, 1995, that action was “dismissed for failure to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Estate of Seiser v. LaskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- St. Charles Savings Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Buchanan v. CabinessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Missouri & Southwestern Land Co. v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cella v. CellaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001