Legal Opinion

Cabral v. Young

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCortland A. Johnson, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding to review the determination of the Town Zoning Board of Appeals, in denying the applications made by both the owner and the contract vendee, for a variance to erect a house on a plot 40 feet by 100 feet in a residential B zone, which is presently zoned for a minimum plot of 60 feet by 100 feet.

The four lots in question, numbers 7 through 10, came into the common ownership of Heist on in 1945. A house had been built on Lots 9 and 10 in 1936.

Petitioner Cabral bought the whole parcel containing about 8,000 square feet from Helston in Hovember, 1956.

*551A contract was…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Graham v. Itasca County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Fina Homes, Inc. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fina Homes, Inc. v. BeckelNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Riviere v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Junar Construction Co. v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API