Legal Opinion

State v. Sargent

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1988No. 54664-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

111 Wn.2d 641 (1988)

762 P.2d 1127

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH SHERMAN SARGENT, Petitioner.

No. 54664-9.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 27, 1988.

Helen Halpert of Seattle-King County Public Defender Association, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Sally F. Stanfield, Deputy, for respondent.

DORE, J.

We hold that the State violated Sargent's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when a probation officer preparing a sentencing statement failed to give defendant Miranda warnings and assistance of counsel. The interview resulted in a confession which was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API