Legal Opinion

Buckner v. . C. I. T. Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, J".

Tbe plaintiff recovered a judgment for tbe cancellation of bis note and of tbe retained title contract and for tbe delivery to bim of tbe unencumbered title to tbe sedan. It therefore becomes necessary to determine whether tbe appllant’s exceptions present good cause for a new trial or a reversal or modification of tbe judgment.

Tbe receipt referred to in tbe statement of facts recites tbe plaintiff’s payment to Asheville Overland-Knight, Inc., of $540 “for C. I. T.' Corporation.” Tbe appellant excepted for tbe assigned reason that this recital is a declaration of agency made by tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arndt v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Western Carolina Realty Co. v. RumboughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. LazarusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Sperry Flour Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Credit Co. v. . GreenhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API