Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Lazarus
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
Was there any competent evidence that tbe Guaranty Title and Trust Corporation was the agent of the Seaboard Citizens National Bank, trustee, holder, in making collections upon the Lazarus notes ?
Manifestly, if the Guaranty Title and Trust Corporation was the collecting agent of the Seaboard Citizens National Bank, the holder, then the payment by Lazarus to such agent constituted payment to the holder. A jury trial was waived, and it was agreed by all parties that the judge should find the facts. Pursuant to such stipulation the judge answered certain issues appearing in the record. There was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buchanan v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Baldwin v. AdkersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Buckner v. . C. I. T. CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Credit Co. v. . GreenhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- National Bondholders Corp. v. Seaboard Citizens Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- McGuinn v. . High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.