Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 3, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Carl Moore, was convicted of carnal knowledge 1 following a jury trial in the Somerset County Superior Court. From a judgment entered against him, the defendant appeals. We deny the appeal.

The victim was a ten-year-old niece of the defendant. On the morning of December 6, 1975, she went to the defendant’s house at his request. While they were alone, the defendant raped his niece. In a three-count indictment Moore was charged with carnal knowledge, crime against nature (sodomy), 2 and indecent liberties. 3 During trial, the sodomy count was dismissed by the State for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NorthupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  3. Antelope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. State v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  5. State v. GravesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. State v. RomanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. State v. RouselleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. State v. ChenardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API