Legal Opinion
Isaacs v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 27, 1966No. 41276, 41527Published
1Opinion of the Court
437 P.2d 229 (1966)
Roy ISAACS for himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
OKLAHOMA CITY, a Municipal Corporation, Urban Renewal Authority, Granville Tomerlin, Chairman, F.D. Moon, Vice-Chairman, C. Kenneth Woodard, Secretary, Reuben G. Martin, Member, Ralph L. Boien, Member, James T. Yeilding, Executive Director, Defendants in Error.
S.M. ROOF, Loal C. Wilson and J.V. Garrett, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
TULSA URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a purported public body corporate, of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and its Officers and Members, Leeman Nix, Chairman, Robert Laird, Vice-Chairman, Murray…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Williamson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.