Legal Opinion
Arc of New Jersey, Inc. v. Township of Voorhees
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 19, 1997No. CIV.A. 93-1399PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES
BROTMAN, District Judge:
A. Background
The genesis of this dispute occurred when OARC, a subsidiary of the Camden County Unit for the ARC of New Jersey, Inc., a plaintiff herein, obtained a residential property at 6 Chandler Lane in the Township of Voorhees and intended to use that property as a community residence for eight developmentally disabled men. On December 13, 1990 OARC applied for and received a zoning permit from Voorhees which allowed OARC to use the property as a community home. Upon learning of this intended use, various local residents decided that they…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Of Central New Jersey v. * The Attorney General Of The State Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Lippman v. Bridgecrest Estates I Unit Owners Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Planned Parenthood v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- THE HANSEN FOUNDATION, INC. v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021