Legal Opinion
(PC) Jace v. Lirones
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 5, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00419Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JACE, No.: 1:22-cv-00419-KES-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CERTIFY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 13 v. Doc. 66 14 A. PETERSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Michael Jace is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Jace’s First Amendment retaliation claim 19 against defendant A. Peterson. Jace filed a motion to certify an interlocutory appeal of the 20 dismissal of his claims for First…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Robin James, a Married Person in Her Separate Capacity v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Penguin Putnam, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Steering Committee v. United States of America, and AeromexicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.