Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Union Chevrolet Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr.-Chief Justice Green

delivered the opinion of the Court.

These suits grew out of an automobile accident in which persons in each of the two cars that collided sustained injuries. The cases were tried together and the jury returned verdicts in favor of each plaintiff. There were two defendants — Union Chevrolet Company and Herbert F. Biggins. . On motion for a new trial the circuit jndge concluded that he had erred in submitting the cases to the jury as to defendant Union Chevrolet Company and entered an order, as on directed verdicts, dismissing the suits as to that defendant. He approved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Shockley v. Morristown Produce & Ice Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Roselle v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. American Casualty Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Pratt v. DuckCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  3. Monroe County Motor Co. v. Tennessee Odin Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. McNew v. Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Pairamore v. PairamoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API