Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. McMurray

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2011No. 09-5806Published

1DissentMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge

The majority plainly asserts that a conviction under Tennessee’s aggravated assault statute is not a categorically violent felony. However, because binding, and indeed recent, published authority from this Circuit has explicitly held otherwise, I must dissent. I further note that even if the majority were free to correctly proceed to a modified-categorical analysis under Shepard, it fails to recognize that all of the sources approved by Shepard for consideration in a guilty plea case can be used in evaluation of an Alford plea to .the same extent as a guilty plea.

I

First, the majority plainly…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, Russell Bragg, a Troy Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Geiger v. Tower AutomotiveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API